Description
- Position occupied at the polling station.
- Previous experience as a member of a polling station.
- Assessment of participation as a member of the polling station.
- Information received on the tasks to be performed.
- Level of difficulty of the tasks to be performed.
- Degree of satisfaction (0-10) with participation as a member of a polling station.
- Reaction to a new selection as a member of a polling station.
- Use of the electronic system CAE (Electronically Managed College).
- Reason for not using the electronic CAE system.
- Participation in the management of the computer equipment of the CAE.
- Information received on the functioning of the PPA IT system.
- Tasks in which a problem with the computer system has arisen.
- Comparison of the PPA system with the traditional system in the performance of different tasks.
- Assessment of the benefits of the PPA system.
- Assessment of the use of the PPA system in the future at all tables.
- Degree of satisfaction (0-10) with the CAE system.
- Frequency of use of computer equipment.
- Nationality of the interviewee.
- Additional comments about the system being tested.
Resources
| Name | Format | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2810/0-0|EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTRONICALLY ADMINISTRATED SCHOOL FUNCTIONING (EAS) IN THE 2009 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS|2349/Election tables of Lleida, Pontevedra, Salamanca, Mataró, El Ferrol and Alcalá de Henares/Members of polling stations/both sexes/18 and over/self-fulfilled interview | Unknown | Open resource |