2841|PUBLIC OPINION AND TAX POLICY (XXVII)
Description
- Nationality of the interviewee.
- Frequency with which the operation of public services is discussed.
- Satisfaction with the operation of the various public services: education, health, citizen security, justice and infrastructure.
- Phrase that best expresses its opinion on taxes: They are a means of distributing wealth, it is an obligation that the State imposes it is not well known in exchange for what or, they are necessary for the State to be able to provide public services.
- I agree with the view whether it is preferable to raise or lower taxes in order to spend more or less on social benefits and public services.
- Remuneration received by society in general and by the interviewee and his family in particular for the payment to the State of taxes and contributions.
- Assessment of the amount of resources that the State devotes to: education, public works, unemployment protection, defence, citizen security, health, culture, housing, justice, pensions and social security, transport and communications, environmental protection, development cooperation and research in science and technology.
- I agree with the view that it is necessary to increase taxes in order to improve social services and benefits or with the view that it is possible to reduce taxes and maintain these services.
- Assessment of the degree of responsibility of Spaniards in fulfilling their duties and obligations as citizens. Degree of personal responsibility.
- Assessment of the amount of taxes that Spaniards pay, and comparison with other countries in Europe.
- Justice in the distribution of tax payments.
- Justice in the collection of taxes and tax burden among those with high, medium or low incomes.
- Tax fraud that currently exists in Spain and its effect.
- Assessment of the administration's efforts in the fight against tax fraud.
- Opinion on the number of people who defraud on the income statement.
- Opinion on the amount of fraud in the VAT return.
- Agreement with various sentences on the consequences of tax fraud: is deceived for fear of a review, almost everyone deceives, defrauding does not harm anyone, and by deceiving the rest of citizens is deceived.
- Tax you would dislike more/less if it went up: IRPF or VAT.
- Preference between raising or lowering taxes to spend on social benefits and public services.
- Obligation to file the Income Tax Return this year. Balance of this year's income tax return. Box marked for the allocation of the percentage. Probability of a tax inspection of the income statement to the interviewee.
- Inspection of the income declaration in the last five years, and likelihood of it being made in the coming years. Result of the inspection.
Self-location on a scale (1-10) of wealth. Location of parents and children on the same scale of wealth.
- Assessment (0-10) of the reasons for obtaining an economic position: effort and education or family background and contacts.
- Rating (0-10) of the increase in taxes to have better public services and social benefits, personal preference and political parties.
Self-definition of their political ideology.
- Political ideology scale of the interviewee.
- Participation and remembrance of the vote in the March 2008 general election.
- Coexistence situation.
- Tenure of children, their ages, type of school to which they go and if they are scholarship holders.
- Type of health service, public or private, used.
- Housing tenure regime.
- Type of school during primary education and benefit of scholarship during the studies of the interviewee.
- Religious practice.
- Assessment of personal economic situation.
- Valuation of personal income.
Resources
| Name |
Format |
Description |
Link |
|
0 |
|
http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=10562&%3Bcuestionario=12616&%3Bmuestra=18139 |
Tags
- administración-y-servicios-públicos
- hacienda-pública-y-política-fiscal
- estudio-cuantitativo