Gangs in Rural America, 1996-1998
Description
This study was undertaken to enable cross-community
analysis of gang trends in all areas of the United States. It was also
designed to provide a comparative analysis of social, economic, and
demographic differences among non-metropolitan jurisdictions in which
gangs were reported to have been persistent problems, those in which
gangs had been more transitory, and those that reported no gang
problems. Data were collected from four separate sources and then
merged into a single dataset using the county Federal Information
Processing Standards (FIPS) code as the attribute of common
identification. The data sources included: (1) local police agency
responses to three waves (1996, 1997, and 1998) of the National Youth
Gang Survey (NYGS), (2) rural-urban classification and county-level
measures of primary economic activity from the Economic Research
Service (ERS) of the United States Department of Agriculture, (3)
county-level economic and demographic data from the County and City
Data Book, 1994, and from USA Counties, 1998, produced by the United
States Department of Commerce, and (4) county-level data on access to
interstate highways provided by Tom Ricketts and Randy Randolph of the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Variables include the
FIPS codes for state, county, county subdivision, and sub-county,
population in the agency jurisdiction, type of jurisdiction, and
whether the county was dependent on farming, mining, manufacturing, or
government. Other variables categorizing counties include retirement
destination, federal lands, commuting, persistent poverty, and
transfer payments. The year gang problems began in that jurisdiction,
number of youth groups, number of active gangs, number of active gang
members, percent of gang members who migrated, and the number of gangs
in 1996, 1997, and 1998 are also available. Rounding out the variables
are unemployment rates, median household income, percent of persons in
county below poverty level, percent of family households that were
one-parent households, percent of housing units in the county that
were vacant, had no telephone, or were renter-occupied, resident
population of the county in 1990 and 1997, change in unemployment
rates, land area of county, percent of persons in the county speaking
Spanish at home, and whether an interstate highway intersected the
county.
Resources
Name |
Format |
Description |
Link |
|
0 |
ICPSR03398.v1 |
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03398.v1 |
Tags
- social-indicators
- rural-crime
- gangs
- demographic-characteristics
- rural-areas
- police-response
- gang-members
- economic-indicators