| Name |
Format |
Description |
Link |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_3.txt.sha256 |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_4.txt.sha256 |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_5.txt.sha256 |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_7.txt.sha256 |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_9.txt.sha256 |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_8.txt.sha256 |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_2.txt.sha256 |
|
0 |
This data shows the variation of coverage ratio in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_2.txt |
|
0 |
variation of Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density varies when the number of CxGs = 3 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_8.txt |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_10.txt.sha256 |
|
0 |
variation of Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density varies when the number of CxGs = 4 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_9.txt |
|
0 |
Distribution of Inter-CxG Edge Weights of all CBSDs in CxG_0 when deployment density = 10 CBSD/square km, propagation model=ITM and number of CxGs=4 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_10.txt |
|
0 |
|
https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-2346 |
|
0 |
This data shows the variation of Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG (AMABCC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) when number of Coexistence Groups = 3 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_4.txt |
|
0 |
variation of Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density changes when the number of CxGs=4 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_7.txt |
|
0 |
This data shows the variation of coverage ratio in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) when number of Coexistence Groups = 4 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_3.txt |
|
0 |
This data shows the variation of Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG (AMABCC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) when number of Coexistence Groups = 4 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_5.txt |
|
0 |
variation of Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density changes when the number of CxGs=3 |
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_6.txt |
|
47 |
|
https://data.nist.gov/od/ds/mds2-2346/figure_6.txt.sha256 |