| Name |
Format |
Description |
Link |
|
0 |
View the complete metadata record on InPort for more information about this dataset. |
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/30692 |
|
33 |
NOAA Data Management Plan for this record on InPort. |
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inportserve/waf/noaa/nmfs/sefsc/dmp/pdf/30692.pdf |
|
0 |
The information provided on this page seeks to define how the GCMD Keywords are structured, used and accessed. It also provides information on how users can participate in the further development of the keywords. |
https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/find-data/idn/gcmd-keywords |
|
0 |
Table 2. Mean growth rates (TL, biomass) and sediment contaminant levels (PAH, Alkanes) measured in each mesocosm during August 2011 white shrimp experiment. Missing growth data are for mesocosms where no experimental shrimp were recovered.
Table 2 is from paper: Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, and M. S. Miles. 2014. Effect of Deepwater Horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1403-1414. |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12237-013-9766-1 |
|
0 |
Table 1. Mean growth rates (TL, biomass) and sediment contaminant levels (PAH, Alkanes) measured in each mesocosm during May 2011 brown shrimp experiment. Missing growth data are for mesocosms where no experimental shrimp were recovered.
This Table is for paper: Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, and M. S. Miles. 2014. Effect of Deepwater Horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1403-1414. |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12237-013-9766-1 |
|
0 |
Table 5. Comparison of mean (SE) infaunal prey (annelids, crustaceans, total) biomass as mg dry weight 78.5 cm-2 among five Oiling (Heavy, Moderate, Light, Very Light, None) and between two Food treatment levels (No Food, Food Added). Each mean was estimated from 20 or 100 pooled sediment core samples collected prior to initiating May and August 2011 shrimp growth experiments at each Oiling and Food treatment level, respectively. ANOVA results (p values) are given for main effects of Oiling level and Food Treatments, and Oiling level X Food Interaction.
Table 5 is for paper: Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, and M. S. Miles. 2014. Effect of Deepwater Horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1403-1414. |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12237-013-9766-1 |
|
0 |
Table 4. Comparison of mean (+/-SE) daily shrimp growth rates as % body wet weight d-1 among five oiling levels (Heavy, Moderate, Light, Very Light, None) and two Food (No Food Added, Food Added) treatment levels. Data were derived from field experiments conducted in May 2011 for brown shrimp and August 2011 for white shrimp. Each growth rate mean was derived from 5 samples (except brown shrimp, where Heavy Food = 4 samples, Light Food = 4, None, Food added = 4, None, No Food added = 4; white shrimp: Light Food = 4, Light, No Food added = 3, None, Food added = 4), and each sample was determined by calculating mean growth rate of experimental shrimp recovered from a field enclosure.
Table 4 is from paper: Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, and M. S. Miles. 2014. Effect of Deepwater Horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1403-1414. |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12237-013-9766-1 |
|
0 |
Table 3. Comparison of mean (+/-SE) recovery rates for experimental shrimp among five oiling levels (Heavy, Moderate, Light, Very Light, None) and two Food levels (No Food Added, Food Added). Data were derived from field experiments conducted in May 2011 for brown shrimp and August 2011 for white shrimp. Each mean was derived from 5 samples. ZR = number of mesocosms with zero recovered shrimp.
Table 3 is from paper: Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, and M. S. Miles. 2014. Effect of Deepwater Horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 7: 1403-1414. |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12237-013-9766-1 |
|
0 |
Supplemental material to journal article contains figure 1 with two bar graphs.
Bottom graph is mean growth rate of white shrimp in mg per day-1 vs oiling treatment (a qualitative comparison of oil concentration in sediments). Comparison of growth rates where extra food is or is not added to the mesocosm.
Bottom graph is mean growth rate of brown shrimp in mg per day-1 vs oiling treatment (a qualitative comparison of oil concentration in sediments). Comparison of growth rates where extra food is or is not added to the mesocosm.
These graphs are for paper: Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, and M. S. Miles. 2014. Effect of Deepwater Horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1403-1414. |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12237-013-9766-1 |