Description

In the last five years, eroding gold prices, increasing production costs and the depletion of reserves have resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of drilling to evaluate placer deposits. Accurate sampling and deposit evaluation would enable planning for cost-effective mining and reclamation. However, sampling placer gravel accurately is an extremely difficult task due to the nugget effect (inclusion or loss of a single particle of gold) and any errors are compounded by the small size of the drill samples. Additional sampling errors result from contamination, splitting and fire assaying. More placer mine failures can be attributed directly to improper sampling and sample processing practices during property evaluation than to any other cause. There is very little impartial, accurate information available to guide the selection of modern drills. Drillers and their equipment are often selected for their penetration rate or cost-per-foot rather than for sampling accuracy or gold recovery. A brief description of several types of drills including churn, auger, rotary tricone, reverse circulation, Becker hammer, down-the-hole hammer and Sonic drills is summarized in Section 6 from references. Three solid auger drills, two types of fully cased normal circulation (N/C) drills and two types of reverse circulation (R/C) drills were evaluated under typical Yukon field conditions using radioactive placer gold as tracers (radiotracers). A frozen cylindrical core of compacted gravel containing four sizes (1.2-1.7, 0.60-0.84, 0.3-0.42 and 0.15-0.21 mm) (-10+14, -20+28, -35+48 and -65+100 mesh) of radiotracers was placed in 44 drill holes and the holes were redrilled. Hand-held scintillometres were used to track gold losses during drilling, sample recovery and sample processing. Radiotracers lost due to spillage and blow-by around the collar (top) of the hole, and those trapped in drilling equipment (carry-over) were easily located. The results of these tests are summarized Table 1. There was no significant difference between the recovery of the four sizes of gold particles with any of the fully cased nomal circulation, reverse circulation or auger drills tested. Observations and down-hole scintillometre records indicate that the radiotracers did not follow the bit down the hole and were either carried out of the hole or forced onto to the sides of the hole at or above the depth at which the radiotracer core was positioned.

Resources

Name	Format	Description	Link
Report	HTML		https://data.geology.gov.yk.ca/reference/42889
Report	HTML		https://data.geology.gov.yk.ca/reference/42889
Report	Unknown		https://data.geology.gov.yk.ca/reference/42889
Original metadata (https://open.yukon.ca)	HTML		https://open.yukon.ca/data/datasets/evaluation-gold-recovery-placer-drills-using-radio-tracers-part-ii
Original metadata (https://open.yukon.ca)	HTML		https://open.yukon.ca/data/datasets/evaluation-gold-recovery-placer-drills-using-radio-tracers-part-ii
Original metadata (https://open.yukon.ca)	HTML		https://open.yukon.ca/data/datasets/evaluation-gold-recovery-placer-drills-using-radio-tracers-part-ii

Tags

Topics

Categories