| Name |
Format |
Description |
Link |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to the baseline measurement applied in July 2020. The data was collected via online survey with the objective of diagnosing the background and experience of participants in reconciliation processes with adversary groups. They were also asked to value their level of knowledge in different reconciliation methods and tools. |
https://data.usaid.gov/d/anms-mh9f |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to three voluntary monitoring measurements held between July and October 2020. The data was collected via online survey aiming to capture levels of pertinence and satisfaction of participants with the activities proposed during the sessions. They were also asked to value the facilitators’ performance and clarity of the shared methods. |
https://data.usaid.gov/d/e3is-yft7 |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to follow-up measurement applied in September 2020. The data was collected via online survey with the objective of capturing participants’ progress in the appropriation of tools for reconciliation processes with adversary groups. They were also asked to identify the challenges of implementing the different methodologies and value the importance of reconciliation processes within their organizations. |
https://data.usaid.gov/d/8jy4-uivs |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to end-line measurement applied in November 2020. The data was collected via online survey aiming to capture participant’s escalation and appropriation of Prolongar’s reconciliation model (in its three different levels: individual, interpersonal and communitary) in the projects of their organizations. Participants were also asked to share their personal experiences learning Prolongar’s reconciliation model and value the relevance of the tools acquired. |
https://data.usaid.gov/d/9pkq-66qy |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to the baseline measurement applied in July 2020. The data was collected via online survey with the objective of diagnosing the background and experience of participants in reconciliation processes with adversary groups. They were also asked to value their level of knowledge in different reconciliation methods and tools. |
https://datahub.usaid.gov/d/anms-mh9f |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to follow-up measurement applied in September 2020. The data was collected via online survey with the objective of capturing participants’ progress in the appropriation of tools for reconciliation processes with adversary groups. They were also asked to identify the challenges of implementing the different methodologies and value the importance of reconciliation processes within their organizations. |
https://datahub.usaid.gov/d/8jy4-uivs |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to three voluntary monitoring measurements held between July and October 2020. The data was collected via online survey aiming to capture levels of pertinence and satisfaction of participants with the activities proposed during the sessions. They were also asked to value the facilitators’ performance and clarity of the shared methods. |
https://datahub.usaid.gov/d/e3is-yft7 |
|
21 |
This dataset is related to end-line measurement applied in November 2020. The data was collected via online survey aiming to capture participant’s escalation and appropriation of Prolongar’s reconciliation model (in its three different levels: individual, interpersonal and communitary) in the projects of their organizations. Participants were also asked to share their personal experiences learning Prolongar’s reconciliation model and value the relevance of the tools acquired. |
https://datahub.usaid.gov/d/9pkq-66qy |