Description
Each case is given a data quality score based on how well it mapped. These can be lumped into seven groups to provide a simplified way to understand the scores.
- Group 1: Direct PLSS Match. Scores “0”, “1”, “2”, “3” should all have a match to the PLSS data. There are slight differences, but the primary expectation is that these match the PLSS.
- Group 2: Calculated PLSS Match. Scores “4”, “4.1”, “5”, “6”, “7” and “8” were generated through a process of creating the geometry that is not a direct capture from the PLSS. They represent a best guess based on the underlining PLSS
- Group 3 – Mapped to Section. Score of “8.1”, “8.2”, “8.3”, “9” and “10” are mapped to the Section for various reasons (refer to log information in data quality field).
- Group 4- Combination of mapped and unmapped areas. Score of 15 represents a case that has some portions that would map and others that do not.
- Group 5 – No NLSDB Geometry, Only Attributes. Scores “11”, “12”, “20”, “21” and “22” do not have a match to the PLSS and no geometry is in the NLSDB, and only attributes exist in the data.
- Group 6 – Mapped to County. Scores of “25” map to the County.
- Group 7 – Improved Geometry. Scores of “100” are cases that have had their geometry edited by BLM staff using ArcGIS Pro or MLRS bulk upload tool.
Resources
Name | Format | Description | Link |
---|---|---|---|
21 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/BLM-EGIS::blm-natl-mlrs-land-use-authorization-leases-permits-easements | ||
3 | https://gis.blm.gov/nlsdb/rest/services/HUB/BLM_Natl_MLRS_LUA_Leases_Permits_Esmts/FeatureServer/0 | ||
55 | https://blm-egis.maps.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/db7617e39e6a451d827125391cadb9f1/info/metadata/metadata.xml?format=iso19139 | ||
21 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/maps/BLM-EGIS::blm-natl-mlrs-land-use-authorization-leases-permits-easements | ||
25 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/db7617e39e6a451d827125391cadb9f1/kml?layers=0 | ||
15 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/db7617e39e6a451d827125391cadb9f1/geojson?layers=0 | ||
8 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/db7617e39e6a451d827125391cadb9f1/csv?layers=0 | ||
57 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/db7617e39e6a451d827125391cadb9f1/filegdb?layers=0 | ||
57 | https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/api/download/v1/items/db7617e39e6a451d827125391cadb9f1/shapefile?layers=0 |
Tags
- new-york
- indiana
- alaska
- montana
- utah
- delaware
- missouri
- colorado
- geospatial
- idaho
- lease
- district-of-columbia
- new-jersey
- wyoming
- south-dakota
- kentucky
- authorization
- tennessee
- virginia
- mississippi
- easement
- michigan
- vermont
- kansas
- maine
- south-carolina
- arkansas
- west-virginia
- texas
- geoscientificinformation
- pennsylvania
- connecticut
- eastern-states
- maryland
- california
- land-grid
- arizona
- north-carolina
- boundaries
- washington
- plss
- section
- new-hampshire
- florida
- wisconsin
- iowa
- louisiana
- permit
- alabama
- ohio
- oklahoma
- rhode-island
- north-dakota
- public-land-survey-system
- georgia
- management
- minnesota
- illinois
- new-mexico
- planningcadastre
- oregon
- nevada
- massachusetts
- nebraska
- township